How VeriFalcon works
The workflow is intentionally simple: choose the right crawler mode, run a scan against the routes that matter, then review the results by failure type instead of parsing a raw crawl dump.
Use the JavaScript crawler for React, Next.js, SPA, and authenticated flows, or the static crawler for docs, blogs, and HTML-first websites where speed matters more than browser execution.
What The Workflow Includes Today
Use the JavaScript crawler for React, Next.js, SPA, and authenticated flows, or the static crawler for docs, blogs, and HTML-first websites where speed matters more than browser execution.
The product already includes live scan updates plus post-scan tabs and exports for broken pages, resources, protected routes, JS errors, API failures, scanner errors, and grouped links.
The JavaScript path runs through browser lifecycle controls and queue management because the product is designed to be usable in real operations, not just in a demo crawl.
Workflow Screens From The Current Product
Step 1: choose the crawler mode
Use the JavaScript crawler for React, Next.js, Vue, SPA, and authenticated product surfaces. Use the static crawler for docs, blogs, and other non-JavaScript sites where raw HTTP crawling is enough.
That distinction matters because it changes both the coverage model and the types of failures that can be detected during the scan.
Step 2: crawl and classify
As the scan runs, VeriFalcon tracks broken pages, soft 404s, protected routes, blocked pages, JS failures, API failures, scanner errors, and discovered-but-not-crawled pages. The point is to separate failure classes that teams fix differently instead of burying everything inside one status bucket.
Step 3: review by issue type
Instead of making teams parse one giant blob of results, VeriFalcon exposes tabs and exports for the issue classes people usually fix differently.
That makes the workflow useful for engineering, QA, docs, and technical SEO teams without pretending all of them need the same report shape.
Related Pages
Continue with pages that map to adjacent use cases and comparisons.